The best part about the Lambda Pi Eta Initiation meeting was the cake of course. |
Friday, September 27, 2013
Monday, September 23, 2013
Tuesday, September 17, 2013
Rocky Bleier - The Unknown Sponsor of my Athletic Career

Over the past week or so I have tried to come up with a blog about how upset I have been with sports lately. I've deleted a handful of them because I felt like all I was doing was attacking PED's, the athletes that take them, and writing what I felt it takes to make a real athlete. What sparked this topic was the MLB's recent Biogenesis sweep, and NASCAR's recent Chase for the Sprint Cup scandal.
Instead of talking about things that have made me upset with sports, I decided to write about a man who I have always idolized and who I consider to be a hero in the tainted world of professional athletes. That man, is Rocky Bleier.
![]() |
Rocky Bleier - Photo Courtesy of blogs.militarytimes.com |
Unfortunately, during my final meet of my senior year, I injured my shoulder pretty bad. I was on my third of four throws in the shot put, when my shoulder just snapped. They thought it may have just been a bicep tear, but they weren't sure. I came to Slippery Rock University with every intention of competing with the Rock Athletics Track Team, but my body had other plans. My shoulder continued to get worse, and I ended up home for the Thanksgiving break, and found out that I may have torn the biceps tendon, needed surgery and would probably never throw again. The pain I felt was almost unbearable - more mentally than physically. It took months, but I finally came to terms with the fact that I would more than likely never throw again. For once, I felt like I might have a small taste of what Rocky felt.
![]() |
Rocky Bleier and me at Steelers Fan Blitz 2013 - One of the greatest moments in my 21 years of living on this planet. |
So my question for all of you out there is this: WHO inspires you? WHY do they inspire you? The person might not be a professional athlete. It could be a genius like Steve Jobs, a musical inspiration like John Lennon. Please comment on this blog post and share your stories!
Labels:
discus,
football,
hero,
idol,
injuries,
NFL,
PEDs,
Pittsburgh,
professional athletes,
Rocky Bleier,
shot put,
soldier,
sports,
Steelers,
steroids,
Track and Field,
war
Monday, September 16, 2013
Just the Facts: Age Requirements on Drinking Alcohol
"If I can go to war and fight for my country, I should be able to have a drink."
"The brain is still developing at 18 and allowing alcohol consumption at that age would interfere with brain development."
The argument for lowering the age from 21 to 18 for alcohol consumption in the United States isn't new - it's a historical topic that has been around for years. People base their opinions based on many things, sometimes factual, and sometimes strictly feeling based. Regardless, the age requirement doesn't seem to be changing anytime soon. However, here's some information you may find interesting, that may help to not only get you informed, but also help you make a decision on how you feel about the situation. Just in case you ever decided that you should stand up and make your feelings heard. Might as well at least get the facts straight, right?
One thing to make note of is that the global average minimum legal drinking age is 15.9. Yes, you read that correctly. Overall, most countries have the drinking age set at 18, but there are many countries where the number is less than 18, and 12 countries, where the age is higher than 18. Curious to see which ones have what age restrictions? Click here!
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), alcohol results in 2.5 million deaths each year, and 320,000 people between the ages of 15-19 die of alcohol related causes. The United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says that in the United States 15,590 deaths are caused from alcoholic liver diseases, and 25,692 are alcohol induced deaths (this includes accidents and homicides). The CDC also states that 51% of adults (18 or over) are "regular drinkers" in the U.S. (meaning they have had 12 drinks or more in the past year).
Even if the drinking age was lowered, people below that age mark would more than likely still drink, because underage drinking is already a problem we face today. The National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism reports that 10.4 million people between the ages of 12 and 20 drank more than a few sips of alcohol in 2009. They also found that the older they get, the more they drink. By 15, half of the teens surveyed said they have had at least one drink. By 18, more than 70% said they have had at least one drink.
So lets say you drink underage, and get caught. Now what? What happens to you varies by state. Typically, you will be fined and may even be placed into a diversion program or have to serve community service hours. But these fines aren't enough to stop people from drinking underage. And would lowering the legal requirement also lower the age when youth start to try alcohol?
There are many arguments for both sides of this topic. The U.S. lets its citizens make legal decisions at 18, and considers its citizens adults at that age. However, many would argue that you are still not old enough to make such decisions at such a young age because brain development is still occurring, and will continue to develop until age 25. One could easily argue that the drinking age should be increased from 21 to 25.
Regardless, it does not seem like there will be any changes made to this law anytime in the near future. Teens will continue to drink underage, death tolls will continue to rise due to alcohol related deaths, and the world will continue to decide what age is the "right age" to allow people to hinder their mental capabilities and it be "legal".
Labels:
18,
21,
age requirement,
alcohol,
change,
consumption,
drinking,
laws,
United States
Thursday, September 5, 2013
The Never Ending Saga of the Penn State Sandusky Scandal

The article I read continued the never ending saga of the Penn State Jerry Sandusky scandal. If you are interested in reading it, please click here. For those of you who do not know me, I am a Texas Longhorns football fan. I do however, have a sister who attends Penn State in State College, Pennsylvania, and have quickly learned to love the school and the football team. Even though I have been a Longhorn fan for many years, I have always loved and supported the great man that was Joe Paterno.
I have been shocked and amazed by how the media has chosen to cover this story from its beginning back in November of 2011. The media has tried to awe and amaze us with facts about the cover up, pinning blame on Joe Paterno, former university President Graham Spanier, former university Athletic Director Tim Curly, and former Senior Vice President of Finance and Business Gary Schultz. Any news story that was produced showed photos of Joe Paterno, followed by the headline of "The Penn State Scandal". We saw footage on almost every television news station of Penn State Students rioting in the streets the night that Joe Paterno was fired. Media vans were flipped and students were deemed to be "on a rampage" due to the removal of their beloved Coach.
According to the Admissions Page for Penn State University Park, approximately 35,000 students attend their largest campus. Approximately 1,000 of these students were in attendance of the riot the night that Paterno was fired. Considering that there are 35,000 students on that campus, it could have been far worse. But news organizations painted it out that the entire student body was rioting at the loss of their coach.
![]() |
Candlelight Vigil held at PSU for the victims. |
Now, here is what I have a problem with. Why was it that every time the Penn State Scandal was brought up, Joe Paterno's face was shown. Joe Paterno is not the one who abused those innocent children. The only person whose face should have been shown, was that of Jerry Sandusky.
My next issue is the people that say "he should have done more". Sure, I see your point, and I agree, but only to a certain degree. Here's my arguments for this issue.
- Take a moment to consider the generation Joe Paterno was from. Also, take a moment to consider how old the man was. That generation really didn't openly discuss sexual topics. It was something that was to be left behind closed doors. Maybe Paterno didn't realize how bad the situation was - not because he was trying to protect his program, but because he simply couldn't wrap his head around what was going on.
- Now think of a time when you reported an incident to whoever your higher up official is, or even filed a report to the police. What is it that you usually hear from them once you turn in the information? "Thank you, we will investigate this." and usually, you will never hear what came out of that investigation. Joe Paterno did what he was LEGALLY required to do. An incident was reported to him, and he took it to the people above him, and was told it would be looked into. And from what we can gather, we can assume a few things. One of which is that he turned it in, and never heard anything more of it. Another is that he turned it in, and knew that there was more going on and didn't do anything about it.
I simply can not wrap my head around the comments that "he didn't do enough". Change your sentence, please. Joe Paterno did what he was legally required to do. COULD he have done more, yes. Could he have called the police if he felt it wasn't being investigated properly? Yes! Could he have placed a phone call every day to make sure that the situation was being handled properly? Yes! But would anything more have come of it? Who knows! The man was old. He wasn't even on the sidelines for the majority of the football games because of it. How much energy do you think one old man could put toward a situation, when he was probably very confident that the school he loved so much and dedicated his life to should have been taking care of the situation.

But lets remember, that this man was a bad man, and lacked any form of morals, and only cared about football.
So the sanctions come out, and everyone is so happy because "Penn State deserves everything it has coming to it". Why would you ever think that students who weren't even involved deserved to have games stripped from them? Why should they lose all of their wins? Why were the punishments so harsh?
Lets go back to when the Duke Lacross team had charges brought against players for an alleged rape incident. The NCAA decided not to get involved because it was a criminal case. So why is it that they can get involved with a criminal case involving a coach of a team? This incident had nothing to do with students of the school, yet they are the ones being punished for actions that they had no control over?
Then comes the incident with Notre Dame that was barely even covered in the news. Girls were allegedly raped by football players, and then threatened not to go to the cops because "you don't mess with the football team". The girls were harassed so much that one of them, who was a freshmen, went to far as to commit suicide because she couldn't handle it.
Did the NCAA do anything? Those players were playing in championship games like nothing even happened. There was no national story with news airing 24/7 about the Notre Dame Scandal. So what made Penn State such a priority over schools with similar incidents like the Duke Lacross team or Notre Dame?
All and all, I am curious to see what all is said about there being no evidence that Paterno did anything to cover up this scandal. I will forever be a Joe Paterno fan, and a firm believer in what he stood for. I can't begin to wrap my head around how people think he was this evil and corrupt man, who cared only about football. When that is in fact the farthest thing from the truth. I hope that one day, his name will be wiped clean, and all that he stood for will be what he was remembered for, and not this scandal that has ruined Penn State in the eyes of many.
Lastly, to all my Penn State friends and family members. Just remember to stay strong, and don't let people with negative opinions weigh you down. The actions of a few corrupt people do not equal the actions of the whole. You all have done things to be proud of at that university, THON being one of the most important ones. You had a record breaking year last year, so keep up the good work and break it again this year. FTK!
WE ARE.... PENN STATE!
All and all, I am curious to see what all is said about there being no evidence that Paterno did anything to cover up this scandal. I will forever be a Joe Paterno fan, and a firm believer in what he stood for. I can't begin to wrap my head around how people think he was this evil and corrupt man, who cared only about football. When that is in fact the farthest thing from the truth. I hope that one day, his name will be wiped clean, and all that he stood for will be what he was remembered for, and not this scandal that has ruined Penn State in the eyes of many.
WE ARE.... PENN STATE!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)